RIM Mismanagement

As a new GM Manager and Kia mainstay, it's insane to see the difference in the programs respectively.
GM's RIM encourages us to invest money on single sales for most parts, has us manage them for a year, and send them back. So the dealer takes on the asset and has to manage it for a year for... a small fee to send back?
Certainly not worth managing a part for beyond a whole year on a single demand.
I know I'm not the first to say, Man, i'm spending money on nothing in this program and wasting time that could used to, I don't know... train employees, improve customer experience.
That being said, GM's carrot and stick program is clearly Gm favored and set up with a decent sized stick for those of us who should ever struggle to make PASE (mind you in an environment where GM supplies parts slower than many other suppliers while being unable to provide remotely accurate tracking).
So here's the question. Who has turned their back on RIM, and what has been the result? I understand the 1% fee, and I believe a decrease in accrual funds. If that is all this is, I will spend less money taking the 1% fee than continually adding garbage to the equation.
This combined with the generous 35% restock fee (because industry standard just isn't good enough) does not encourage the dealer to make sound business decisions.
If you've done something to try to help your inventory combat RIM nonsense, please let me know. Thanks!
GM's RIM encourages us to invest money on single sales for most parts, has us manage them for a year, and send them back. So the dealer takes on the asset and has to manage it for a year for... a small fee to send back?
Certainly not worth managing a part for beyond a whole year on a single demand.
I know I'm not the first to say, Man, i'm spending money on nothing in this program and wasting time that could used to, I don't know... train employees, improve customer experience.
That being said, GM's carrot and stick program is clearly Gm favored and set up with a decent sized stick for those of us who should ever struggle to make PASE (mind you in an environment where GM supplies parts slower than many other suppliers while being unable to provide remotely accurate tracking).
So here's the question. Who has turned their back on RIM, and what has been the result? I understand the 1% fee, and I believe a decrease in accrual funds. If that is all this is, I will spend less money taking the 1% fee than continually adding garbage to the equation.
This combined with the generous 35% restock fee (because industry standard just isn't good enough) does not encourage the dealer to make sound business decisions.
If you've done something to try to help your inventory combat RIM nonsense, please let me know. Thanks!