by Gerry Laughlin » Wed Apr 17, 2002 8:26 am
I have tried to stir up some interest here and among my local dealers in responding to the GMSPO changes, but it seems as though a what will be, will be attitude is out there. I also find it amazing how many parts managers did not even know about the changes. Like I said in my first post, GM is betting on our complacency and it is a pretty safe bet. What the heck, I personally will survive by tightening up different aspects of my operation.
Besides my anger with GMSPO, I do feel a little resentment towards some of my peers though, every time someone has complained on this forum about the split with service they are basically flamed and accused of not working together with the service department. Thats BS. I am like most other managers on this forum and believe that working together with my best customer (the Service Department) is in my best interest and in the dealers best interest. But we are in an age where comparison information abounds, and this information is used in our industry primarily to gauge how well we as managers are performing our job. How many of you guys are in dealer 20s. Dont you receive a comparison booklet? Your local dealer association is also probably sending out information to the dealer to be used for comparisons. Profit Centers whole goal is comparison data. I guarantee if any one of you falls to far outside the norm that appears on these sources of information you are going to be called to answer.
Comparison data was used by GMSPO against us; by comparing our discounts to other manufacturers they were able to justify the cuts. Without knowing all the facts it almost appears as though they were justified. But we all know that the other manufacturers arent forcing the parts department to split their profits. The Ford dealer down the street has basically the same expenses as me, his people cost about the same, our rent and electric are similar, yet I am expected to be on par with him while he gets to keep all profit on parts. The information used by GMSPO to compare us to other manufacturers is basically skewed, and until the split goes away it will continue to be so.
The truly amazing thing was how Duane Miller responded to the question posed to him about the split. He didnt even know that the split is outlined in the GM Standards of Accounting and is NOT an internal dealer decision. Gee, thats brilliant, I would expect a man in his position to have a better grasp of how and what conditions he forces his customers operate under.
Lastly, I hope to God that I am not being to paranoid here, but I fear that with the push to pay retail markup on warranty parts that GM may be a laying out a path to pay markup based on our acquisition costs on parts not purchased directly from GMSPO. Since GM pays extra if we pick up a part from another dealer, I dont believe that in their minds that that it would be wrong to pay less if we procure a part from a WD. If my eventual goal was to pay based on acquisition cost, I know the first thing I would do is limit the places I would have to look in an audit situation. That sounds a bit like what GM is doing with the WDs. I hope that it is just a matter of me becoming cynical in my dealings with GMSPO and the loss of the nave belief that GMSPO is going to do what is right.
Gerry Laughlin