by DealerProfit » Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:06 am
I use NADA guidelines. Hours per RO for example is not a particularly stunning tool, but it is easily leveled across markets to adjust for labor rate variance. Parts to labor ratios, expense guides etc.... Hell I can give you an analysis of most any store in a few hours without ever setting foot in it. The problem is most people think that their problems are unique. With very rare exceptions they are not. For years as a consultant I used to throw a $50.00 bill in front of the Techs as a group and challenge that who ever could throw a problem in front of me that I hadn't seen before the $50.00 was theirs. I only gave it away once.
Too often it is taken as a personal attack when someone says, "Hey this part of your business sucks". Most of us shift to defense instead of saying "why do you say that, and what would you do different?".
It gets worse. The natural tendancy for humans (I have read) is to reach a conclusion and then reach ouut for anything that supports our predrawn conclusion.
Seems to me that the original post on this thread feels exactily that way. Taking more than a little artistic license my impression of the entire thread was "I don't want to be measured against recognized industry benchmarks (for what ever reason) pleae as a group make me feel better about it.
Get your DP to give you a copy of the latest NADA guide book.
Recognize that yeah like the rest of us you are not perfect, but could probably get better.
Take an honest look at your department compared to guide.
Pick one thing and make it better.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat. Just like the shampoo bottle says.
Oh yeah one more thing. Stop periodically and marvel at your successes.
If you need help be specific and send me a note. Yeah I know I'm a jerk, but I am good at what I do.