by David Cates » Sat Nov 13, 1999 9:46 am
I am curious why more service departments don't use ADP's ERO (Electronic Repair Order), R&R's ESI (Electronic Service Invoicing), or UCS's version of the complete automated repair order system. This is one of products that can actually pay for the system. It takes the "leg" work out of the status issue, and, if set up correctly, streamlines the entire process.
Is it because it is sometimes labor intensive, too complicated, or does it just cost too much for the average dealer? I have always thought it was a little pricey, but I have also seen it pay for itself many times over. In dealerships where the product is set up correctly, and used correctly, I have seen tremendous increases in tech productivity, and ultimately service department profits.
I know technology won't solve all of the issues, it just seems like it might resolve some of these. Just curious!