by spwilkins » Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:11 am
Matt,
How much of the client satisfaction scores are based on the strong relationships your CTA's in Birmingham have with your customers? Will those scores stay the same as you water down what I believe is the best part of your product - Birmingham?
Also, when will your product be able to supply real dealerships with real solutions without needing you to contact someone on there behalf or without pacifying the uninformed with the old "next update" line?
The sales force that knows this product is non-existent, overworked, and incompetent. Most of your dealers are used car lots, which means they are happy with F&I but have no concerns about Parts or Service applications. What do high satifaction scores mean to the users here when most of your users do not use Parts or Service? Its another hollow self serving statement and you know it.
One reason the others may not seem willing to take the risk ADP is taking here may be they dont have the same risk. I am willing to bet R&R or UCS or Elite have never asked there customers to go a year without the ability to run a phase in or phase out report. Or, to hit enter 157 times in order to get a report. Do Parts Mangers for other DMS's need to log into service to get cell phone numbers or extensions from the name file? Has R&R or UCS or Elite come out with an update that makes determining if a customer is due for an oil change or tire rotation virtually imposible to do at write-up?
You and so many others from your organization should be embarrassed to be in this forum, a forum dominated by Parts and Service department personell, and imply that your product is in any way competitive with other DMS providers. Its an F&I, Payroll, and Accounting program. Thats not such a bad thing is it? After all, thats what ADP really is, payroll, right?