by Steve Wells » Mon Sep 10, 2001 5:45 pm
Farf,
Shoot you, LOL yes, for making typecasting and discriminating statements that you know are just not true. A Dealer Principal that expects it's Body Shop to run well, turn a respectable profit, and contributes to the overall customer and employee satisfaction index cannot have a Manager that is fundamentally lazy or does not do his or her job. That would be a weak link. Defining what that managers job description does/does not contain can lead to the inner department hostile responses where the responsibility of the ordering process and control of it is unknown to the managers involved. Strike a nerve unquestionably. Yes, I am essentially very proud of the Body Shop I managed at this dealership for 14 years. A small shop, 16 employees, 10,000 sq. ft. that now turns 1.8 million per year in sales. I have been a Diamond level (DaimlerChrysler) Service Manager, a Painter, a Body Tech, a frame tech, and a Mechanical line tech (GM). I have been requested numerous times to join other dealerships and insurance companies claims departments. I have been the Fixed Operations Manager and Computer Systems Administrator for the past 1 years. I have written process controls for our dealership operations for the past 5 years. I am conscious of my name remaining on the web site (the customers do not mind) and have suggested that we overhaul the entire site, as many changes have been made in the past year. As the Fixed Op manager, I have trained and managed every department including the Parts department. When I was requested to improve the parts and service processes, I started at the parts counter and service desk. THEY trained me as a co-worker. I was VERY proud when I was finally able to say without a doubt that I was a parts counterperson or that I was a service advisor. When it came time to change the process to improve, the employees were and are still right there beside me. The Rambling point beingthe line between teamwork and back-delegation is just that Farf, when it is not teamwork!
It was not intended to suggest that the responsibility of the parts department is to baby sit and allow back-delegation from other departments, only to review the processes (if there are any) and if necessary, suggest changes that could effect the overall performance of ALL departments. I did not summarize that Turbo's specific problems with his body shop management are global and occur in every inter-galactic shop know to man. If I do not have the problems associated with orders and returns, why can he also not have them?
The difference would be in the processes, and if they are being followed. If Turbo sees an opportunity to improve the process (including the management of a department), he should communicate that change to his managers or DP. That is teamwork, and why he should go beyond mere cooperation or just doing what it takes to get by. We should not forget that all employees in a dealership are salespersons. Parts, Service, Sales, the lowly Body Shophaha and should be treated as such. And Yes, I will retract the moron comment, you undoubtedly are not, and can articulate your feelings about the Body Shop, LOL, but the whole deck does not contain all spades now does it?
Turbo, teardowns are a required part of operations, necessary for first inspection of non-drivable vehicle insurance appraisals and supplemental parts/damage management. Parts should not be ordered without the consent of the owner of the vehicle with proper explanations of repair/insurance coverage and insurance authorizations to repair. If a total loss occurs after repairs have started (engine/transmission cracked or other high expense) I would find it very unlikely that the insurance co. would not pay parts return fees that were profitable to the parts department with proper documentation and explanations. If your shop manager does not follow proper processes for this, suggest the change.
Steve Wells