Mike, point well taken. Here's a couple of things to concider under what David is suggesting.
I would take a guess that if you combined the sales person and the service advisor, you'd have turnover similar to what you have with your advisors and not your sales people. Our turnover with advisors is very low. The learning curve will be very steep: cross training a combined position would take time.
However, there are a couple of things that bother me with this strategy. What is the work schedule for the sale/service advisor? If this individual is responsible for the service needs of customers they sold a car, who takes care of them when service is needed on the sales person's day off? You could schedule some service, but there's always those emergencies...
You would probably need to have 'teams' that work together (sort of what Mike suggests). Otherwise, it would be confusing.
There is a very strong conviction by my sales staff that the advisors are better trained at handling service issues and likewise, the advisors respect the patience and training of the sales people. There just seems to be an inordinate amount of wasted time (waiting for the next customer, appointent, whatever).
A big thing to concider with the combined sales/service position is it would help solve the 'Open on Weekends for Service'. I have a ton of resistance opening on Saturday, mostly from the advisors, (they're used to M-F) and I don't want to hire additonal people. However, our sales staff is there 7 days a week.
i'm going to think about this a little more and hope we can continue this dicussion.
scott
[This message has been edited by sallen1 (edited 01-13-2000).]
[This message has been edited by sallen1 (edited 01-13-2000).]