by Doug » Sat Mar 11, 2000 9:56 am
Yes, I've tried this (many years ago).At that time it really didn't work too well, too many personell conflicts. It was great with younger, more easily influenced techs but the "old hands" put up massive resistance and rightfully so...the work load was not always fair and req'd constant monitoring by the advisors or me. It worked much better when we changed so the team DID pool all hours, providing, of course, that all team members pulled theit weight equally. Production went up and shop flowed more smoothly and the team members QC'd each others work.A couple key elements: Do your techs have the right personality for teams ?
Are you prepared to eliminate the ones that don't ? (or spend lots of time getting "buy-in", your choice). A couple stubborn techs can sour a great idea and create a real problem for you.
If I could start all over with an entirely fresh set of new hires I'd use team system as you've described. To changeover with existing techs was real work ! However, please don't let my jaded attitude overly influence you... I'm just saying that personalities can make or break your plan.
In our shop each advisor does his own dispatching to his own team. It's been working very well for years...the advisors like the control over work flow and they control the gravy-wars, not the techs.
Getting off on a tangent, why is it that (so often) your most capable, productive techs take up so much of your time ? At every opportunity I am filling slots with young, bright, forward thinking techs that may need some additional training but who don't balk and resist every turn in the road. The business is getting too complex to be burdened with backward thinking prima-donas who defy any attempt of achieving "buy-in" on obviously needed changes, I don't care how qualified they are. Thanks, all, for letting me vent !