troll alert

troll alert

Postby possum » Thu Sep 01, 2016 11:03 am

"anzael" posts are very suspicious, do not click on his embedded website link
possum
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:00 am

Re: troll alert

Postby PartScott » Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:42 pm

So I'm not the only one. :lol: I thought that dude was a little "out there".
PartScott
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:50 pm

Re: troll alert

Postby possum » Thu Sep 01, 2016 12:55 pm

Now this is actually interesting to read :)

Re: Part Returns
by X476 » 11 Jul 2016 23:24
One of my good wholesale customers told me that there is a "trainer" for the aftermarket, that is telling them to not just get an estimate and availability for the parts. He states to just order it all that way the parts are already on the way or there when they sell the job, if you don't sell it send it back "no big deal". Their shop understands the crap we have to go through and does not do this, but I have another that does this quite often and now pays return charges.
by anzael » 01 Sep 2016 06:54
One of my great wholesale clients let me know that there is a "mentor" for the post-retail, which is instructing them to not simply get an assessment and accessibility for the parts. He states to simply arrange it all that way the parts are as of now in transit or there when they offer the employment, in the event that you don't offer it send it back "no major ordeal". Their shop comprehends the poop we need to experience and does not do this, but rather I have another that does this frequently and now pays return charges.

Re: Internal Parts Markup %
by PartScott » 10 Aug 2016 21:30
We get GM list price for internal parts here. Anything other than GM gets billed at cost + 74%.
by anzael » 01 Sep 2016 06:55
We get GM list cost for inward parts here. Something besides GM gets charged at expense + 64%.

Re: Plan for pricing with no list/trade price
by tmundal » 08 Jun 2016 18:20
I've found that the whole MPL process is fairly easy on CDK. Don't know about the other systems, but when you send to DMS from MPL, it will copy over the list and sale prices you have set up for the customers.
Is this whole thing stupid? Absolutely, but it really isn't too difficult, and it actually saves a lot of time on large quotes/orders through partstrader.
by anzael » 01 Sep 2016 06:50
I've found that the entire MPL procedure is genuinely simple on CDK. Don't think about alternate frameworks, yet when you send to DMS from MPL, it will duplicate over the rundown and deal costs you have set up for the clients.
Is it true that this is entire thing dumb? Completely, yet it truly isn't excessively troublesome, and it really spares a great deal of time on expansive quotes/orders through parts merchant.
possum
 
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:00 am

Re: troll alert

Postby PartScott » Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:49 pm

Oh, man...that's great! :lol:
PartScott
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 1:50 pm

Re: troll alert

Postby Zep33 » Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:20 pm

That looks like it's been fed through a translator and back

That does appear to have been eaten by a translator and returned
Zep33
 
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:00 am

Re: troll alert

Postby Denise Trimble » Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:32 pm

I saw the posts they made were remarkably similar to the threads' previous comments, and I assumed it is a bot of some kind.
Denise Trimble
 
Posts: 1116
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:00 am
Location: Ohio


Return to Parts Managers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 19 guests